Re: LF: SWR-off topic

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: SWR-off topic
From:	"M. J. Powell" <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:22:00 +0000
In-reply-to:	<000401c4fb13$98ef8180$f8ce28c3@erica>
References:	<41EA3B2E.152.BF48D9@localhost> <000401c4fb13$98ef8180$f8ce28c3@erica>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Turnpike/6.01-S (<BN9Bj5xaTuEEoRpfPjYmxNjLmM>)

In message <000401c4fb13$98ef8180$f8ce28c3@erica>, g3ldo<[email protected]> writes

I am currently updating some of the antenna material in the RSGB Radio
Communications Handbook.
I have a question about SWR meters.
In my early days of amateur radio I didn't have an SWR meter. I obtained
some idea of antenna/feeder mismatch by using a multiple of half wavelength
of coax and measuring the antenna feed Z using the Pi output capacitor
(suitably calibrated) of the transmitter.
At about the same time I was a RADAR technition in the RAF. When a magnetron
was replaced on 3cm equipment (H2S)


Wasn't H2S 10cm equipment?

Mike
J.Powell

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re: VO1NA on QRSS3, (continued) LF: Re: VO1NA on QRSS3, hamilton mal LF: SWR-off topic, g3ldo LF: Re: SWR-off topic, James Moritz LF: Re: Re: SWR-off topic, g3ldo LF: RE: Re: Re: SWR-off topic, james moritz LF: Re: RE: Re: Re: SWR-off topic, Alan Melia Re: LF: Re: SWR-off topic, M. J. Powell Re: LF: Re: SWR-off topic, Dave Brown LF: Re: SWR-off topic, captbrian LF: Re: SWR-off topic, g3ldo Re: LF: SWR-off topic, M. J. Powell <= Re: LF: SWR-off topic, g3ldo

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Image-Cancelling Exciter, John Andrews
Next by Date:	LF: RE: Test G3YXM?, Dave Pick
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: SWR-off topic, g3ldo
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: SWR-off topic, g3ldo
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]