To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: RE: "The enhanced equations of Maxwell"... |
From: | Joe Craig <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:20:46 -0330 (NST) |
In-reply-to: | <000601c4e11e$e3ba6a90$3801a8c0@JKA> |
References: | <000001c4e11a$228cf940$e6a4c593@RD40002> <000601c4e11e$e3ba6a90$3801a8c0@JKA> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, John Andrews wrote: Jim, >An unusual form of words - rather similar to an e-mail I received recently from my new Nigerian business partners:< Wait a minute! I thought they were MY Nigerian business partners! Oh Boy... Now I've got to split it three ways! I might not have enough left to buy CFH off the Canadian Navy or NAA from the boys in Maine in my quest for a bigger 2200 m signal. Now I'll look into the 'New Maxwell Equations" instead. Electron rotation (spin) was first proposed by Uhlenbeck and Goudschmidt almost a century ago. Lets see... If we plug these new ones into the Shrodinger equation we'll get another wave equation that describes spectral line splitting and barrier penetration (tunnelling) by photons from spinning electrons??! Joe |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Hoar-Frost and Antenna Losses, Thomas Kölpin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: Re: RE: "The enhanced equations of Maxwell"..., Andy |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: RE: "The enhanced equations of Maxwell"..., John Andrews |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: "The enhanced equations of Maxwell"..., Alberto di Bene |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |