To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Re: Re: 137 khz acty |
From: | "John Andrews" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:27:07 +0100 |
References: | <000c01c48034$daba1760$43e8fc3e@l8p8y6> <005f01c481cd$d16bd3c0$15bc0150@captbrian> <001d01c4808b$184067a0$fae8fc3e@l8p8y6> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Mal's comments aside, "QRSS" arose as a way to differentiate CW described in words per minute from the slower variety best described in seconds per dot. "QRSS3" unambigously meant CW sent at 3 seconds per dot. There is nothing official about it, and no attempt has ever been made to incorporate it into the amateur radio lexicon. I believe that the discussion originated within the U.S. "lowfer" community, but I'm sure that Alberto will jump up and correct me if I'm wrong. John Andrews, W1TAG |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: LF test, F6CWN |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: Re: 137 khz acty, captbrian |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: 137 khz acty, hamilton mal |
Next by Thread: | LF: QRSS origin, Mike Dennison |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |