QRSS-1 is smokin fast compared to he usual -30 or -60. I wonder if they
could have gone farther with -60 or something slow?
Mike
WE0H
WD2XGI
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Rik Strobbe
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 2:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: not exactly LF
Hi Alan,
On the webpage they say :
"Both stations used new Wenzel Ultra-Low-Noise 5MHz reference oscillators
as the phase-locking frequency references. Short-term
stability on the order of 4 x 10-13 is required to keep the signals within
a 1Hz filter bandwidth of the demodulating software."
In fact they used QRSS1 (or 1.2 WPM), seems a bit the grey zone between
ordinary CW and QRSS.
It is interesting to note that even at 1 sec/dot a QRSS viewer can dig up
signals that cannot be copied by ear.
73, Rik ON7YD
At 23:11 18/03/2004 +0000, you wrote:
Hi Rik the mind boggles a bit when you think of the stability required for
QRSS up there even 3 sec dot mode. Still I suppose it all relative and you
can read QRSS even if it "zips across" the screen, and need retuning.
Freddie was demo'ing SpecLab at one of the recent Martlesham uWave events.
I
think he was suggesting it as a beacon monitor.
Cheers de Alan G3NYK
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: 18 March 2004 21:59
Subject: LF: not exactly LF
> It's not exactly LF, but W2SZ/4 and WA1ZMS/4 claim a new world record
> on 241GHz ... using QRSS.
> See : http://www.mgef.org/zms_241_vucc.htm
>
> Nice to see that a mode that has his origin on LF found it's way to
> the other end of the spectrum (although some might regret that "the
> disease" is speading)
>
> 73, Rik ON7YD
| 