To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: lf andnoise and offshore. |
From: | "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:40:01 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <008301c3db50$4b377c60$b3c428c3@captbrian> |
References: | <014d01c3dac6$cd3aabe0$f89a8418@Peter> <[email protected]> <008301c3db50$4b377c60$b3c428c3@captbrian> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
captbrian wrote: From the site of Renato Romero ( http://www.vlf.it/submarine/sbmarine.html ) :Franks interesting bit about reception in NC refers to 770khz - a long way from 136 - which in turn is a long way from the navy/submarine freqs. (anyone know what the navy freqs. are ? ) ----Signals directed to atomic submarines in immersion. USA and Russia transmit in the ELF band generating a slow binary code. Frequencies are 76 Hz for the U.S. system and 82 Hz in the Russian system; the E.R.P. (Effective Radiated Power) is small, probably a few Watts, but signals are receivable around the world. ---- Note : they are 76 and 82 Hertz, not kilohertz... 73 Alberto I2PHD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Historical transmission on 981 kHz, Johan Bodin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: lf andnoise and offshore., Frank Gentges |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: lf andnoise and offshore., captbrian |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: lf andnoise and offshore., Frank Gentges |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |