Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: 136 khz LF

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Re: 136 khz LF
From: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 15:33:02 +0100
References: <000c01c3957f$fbe6d4a0$47cdfc3e@l8p8y6> <000f01c395cc$88ece780$045bfea9@RSGB613192> <000201c39639$a74dc560$c8e4fc3e@l8p8y6> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 3:32 PM
Subject: LF: Re: 136 khz LF

hamilton mal wrote:
 
Using speclab this is what was indicated. Nothing calibrated. Relative measurement signal above noise floor 55 db.
I expect to be really meaningful the system needs to be calibrated. Next time I will try the calibrated LEVEL METER
The signal was very strong, likwise M0BMU is also very strong. Large dog bones across the screen !!!!!!
 

Whatever sound card program you use, the indicated level is that of the audio signal reaching
the sound card, and as such is totally dependent from many factors unrelated to the real
field strength of the radio signal. If you change the volume setting of the radio, or the slider
level in the Windows mixer, what is indicated will change.

That dB (not dBm) indication is meant just for relative measurements.
 
Quite right Alberto. I have said this already about speclab and similar progs.

73  Alberto  I2PHD

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>