LF: Re: ZL6QH operational report

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: Re: ZL6QH operational report
From:	"Ed Lesnichy" <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:10:32 +0300
In-reply-to:	<003901c37a46$f3f00a40$c401a8c0@quaycustomer>
Organization:	Ed Lesnichy
References:	<3F630492.29512.41753@localhost> <003901c37a46$f3f00a40$c401a8c0@quaycustomer>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

LF-enthusiasts!

I have just returned to Taganrog from Machta.

I kept imagining someone was TX exactly +0.1Hz from announcement
frequency ;-) But after my new check up on argocaps now ... not
identified signals ;-(

QRN-level for reception ZL6QH now is a little high (abt +10..12dB)
There can be a QRN-level will sufficient in one or 1/2 month later...

There was an interesting big signal accepted equally on 0.5Hz below from
announcement frequency ZL6QH's dots.
It has disappeared abt 1830z (QH's sunrise ;-) Who it was?
I accepted the beacon-test up to 1930z.

Bob, I shall search for the best way on ZL6QH ;-) and wait date of the
following beacon...

73! Ed RU6LA  [email protected]  http://136.73.ru

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re: dcf39, (continued) LF: Re: dcf39, Dave Pick Re: LF: Re: dcf39, Mike Dennison LF: ZL6QH operational report, Vernall LF: ZL6QH report, Jay Rusgrove Re: LF: ZL6QH report, Joe Craig LF: Re: ZL6QH report, Vernall LF: ZL6QH on LF after Christmas, Vernall LF: Re: ZL6QH report, chastant LF: Re: ZL6QH report, John Andrews Re: LF: ZL6QH operational report, Steve Dove LF: Re: ZL6QH operational report, Ed Lesnichy <= LF: Re: dcf39, Ian Kyle

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: ZL6QH report, Laurence KL1X
Next by Date:	LF: Colour-coded azimuth spectrogram, DL4YHF
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: ZL6QH operational report, Steve Dove
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: dcf39, Ian Kyle
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]