LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon

["captbrian" <captbrian@ukonline.co.uk>]

Agreed absolutely. I use the HF beacon chain for just that purpose and I
thank all beacon providers.

Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Pick <g3yxm@wireless.org.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: 27 September 2003 08:10
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon


> True indeed.
>
> But without the beacon tests we wouldn't know whether a QSO was possible or
> when was the best time to try for one.
> When I first started on LF G3XTZ had a QRP beacon on 24/7 which I could
> barely detect. After a series of incremental improvements I had it solid
57.
> It gives people a signal to listen for and therefore encourages activity
> (receive activity, maybe, but activity of some kind!).
>
> 73
> Dave G3YXM
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "captbrian" <captbrian@ukonline.co.uk>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 6:23 AM
> Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon
>
>
> > Hearing a beacon is nice but it is not communication. Communication
> requires
> > that a message be sent and a reply received. Just my view of course.
> >
> > Bryan - G3GVB
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: hamilton mal <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
> > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > Date: 26 September 2003 21:10
> > Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon
> >
> >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "John Andrews" <w1tag@charter.net>
> > >To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > >Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:11 AM
> > >Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon
> > >
> > >
> > >> I in no way associate myself with G3KEV's response to my message.
> > >>
> > >> John Andrews, W1TAG
> > >>
> > >>
> > >We both reached the same conclusion. I agree no association please.
> > >de G3KEV
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >