Agreed absolutely. I use the HF beacon chain for just that purpose and I
thank all beacon providers.

Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Pick <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: 27 September 2003 08:10
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon

True indeed.

But without the beacon tests we wouldn't know whether a QSO was possible or
when was the best time to try for one.
When I first started on LF G3XTZ had a QRP beacon on 24/7 which I could
barely detect. After a series of incremental improvements I had it solid

57.

It gives people a signal to listen for and therefore encourages activity
(receive activity, maybe, but activity of some kind!).

73
Dave G3YXM

----- Original Message -----
From: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 6:23 AM
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon

Hearing a beacon is nice but it is not communication. Communication

requires

that a message be sent and a reply received. Just my view of course.

Bryan - G3GVB
-----Original Message-----
From: hamilton mal <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: 26 September 2003 21:10
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon


>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:11 AM
>Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon
>
>
>> I in no way associate myself with G3KEV's response to my message.
>>
>> John Andrews, W1TAG
>>
>>
>We both reached the same conclusion. I agree no association please.
>de G3KEV
>
>
>
>