Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: VO1NA July 10

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA July 10
From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:26:10 +0100
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Hi all, very interesting plots from Brian. The best times will be very
dependent on exact location since the peaks are due I believe to
constructive interference. This could be totally different as little at 30
to 50kms apart. My plot of CFH for 8/9th was better than 7/8th by some
margin, but remember CFH is further away that VO1NA (at least fron UK)
Unfortunately no plot for last night.

Cheers de Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Rogerson" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: 10 July 2003 10:02
Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA July 10

Dear Joe, Markus, Jim and all,

I was surprised when Jim said that his best reception was on the morning
the 8th as my
best reception was undoubtedly on the morning of the 9th.  Virtually all
the transmission was
at "O" until 05:00utc.  This morning I received only two full call
signs.  Out of interest I have
plotted DCF and CFH for 8-9 and 9-10, unfortunately nothing for 7-8 as my
logging computer
crashed.  I have included the graph with the Argos of the two full call
signs which I think were
received later than those received by Markus.  Certainly there are deep
nulls for the night
of 9-10 whereas none for the night of 8-9.  The Argos and graph are on

Time on Argo utc+1, on graph is utc, sorry the axes are not annotated this
but was thrown
together in a hurry.

73, Brian CT1DRP

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>