To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Important sperimantal revision of ohm's law |
From: | "Laurence J Howell" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:54:19 -0800 |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
04/22/2003 01:14 PM
Any replies will be addressed to: rsgb_lf_group
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: LF: Re: Important sperimantal revision of ohm's law
Ted Hart apparently wrote : > The relative phase relationship between current and voltage thru and on a resistor can be any value. > What the text books say is that a resistor does not change the phase relative to the current applied to it. > It is the duty of a capacitor and inductor to change the phase of the current thru them, > the capacitor causes the current to lead, the inductor to lag. > Let me say that again - a resistor does not change the phase of the current flowing thru it, > but it will accept any arbitray phase of the current relative to the voltage. > [...] Hmmmm, I must investigate which kind of grass does grow where that Ted Hart lives.... It could make a pleasant smoking :-) 73 Alberto I2PHD I agree - what happens is the resistor is a large fraction of a wavelength long! Smoking Pure resistance isnt easy... You have to enhale in phase.... Laurence |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: Re: First GM-YU QSO 136 KHz Completed!, Simon Lewis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Ohm's law revision (II), Alberto di Bene |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Ohm's law revision (II), ipsia |
Next by Thread: | LF: Amidon Cores (slightly diverging from topic), Andy talbot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |