To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Comparison of QRSS speed performance. |
From: | "John Andrews" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:06:40 -0500 |
References: | <003801c2f2f3$e0614140$1b00a8c0@dellboy> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Dave, I did some tests today with Alan G3NYK at about 220km distance, to compare the performance of different QRSS speeds under real band conditions. How much better is QRSS60 than QRSS10 or QRSS3... or CW? Find out our findings at http://www.wireless.org.uk/signoise.htm Quite close to the results I got on a "closed circuit" test with a small xmit loop at my own site: http://www.lwca.org/library/articles/w1tag/1qrss.htm Nice to know that these things work out in the real world. John Andrews, W1TAG |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Comparison of QRSS speed performance., Dave Pick |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: TA 25 March, Mitch Powell |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Comparison of QRSS speed performance., Dave Pick |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Comparison of QRSS speed performance., Rik Strobbe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |