Re: LF: Comparison of QRSS speed performance.

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Comparison of QRSS speed performance.
From:	"Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:48:21 +0100
In-reply-to:	<003801c2f2f3$e0614140$1b00a8c0@dellboy>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

Hello Dave and Alan,

Really impressing how little power is needed to travel 220km at 136kHz. The360mW needed for the CW copy should be no more than about 1mW ERP I guess,QRSS60 does the job with no more than 2uW ERP.


73, Rik  ON7YD

At 17:27 25/03/2003 +0000, you wrote:

Dear all.

I did some tests today with Alan G3NYK at about 220km distance, to compare
the performance of different QRSS speeds under real band conditions. How
much better is QRSS60 than QRSS10 or QRSS3... or CW?
Find out our findings at http://www.wireless.org.uk/signoise.htm

73
Dave G3YXM.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Comparison of QRSS speed performance., Dave Pick LF: Re: Comparison of QRSS speed performance., John Andrews Re: LF: Comparison of QRSS speed performance., Rik Strobbe <=

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: DCF42/49 IM reduced, MarkusVester
Next by Date:	LF: Re: TA 27 March, John Andrews
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: Comparison of QRSS speed performance., John Andrews
Next by Thread:	LF: POUR LES FRANCOPHONES, f1tay
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]