To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: jason etc |
From: | "John Andrews" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:19:23 -0500 |
References: | <004001c2a6c8$8c75de00$74e9fc3e@l8p8y6> <001401c2a6d9$13882a00$482965d5@oemcomputer> <000e01c2a6db$0d7f7260$09dc9384@jka> <004901c2a767$acd4ea20$15e9fc3e@l8p8y6> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Mal, The only loop worth while is a full wave loop at the frequency of operation, the smaller you get in relation to natural resonance the less the capture ability and more critical the tuning, and going off resonance with the slightest movement by wind, rain etc, so it is seldom optimum at the required frequency except you happen to live in Dixie or Texas where the sun always shines!! Well, I guess I'll give up the LF stuff, as I'll never hear anything. Thanks for setting me straight. It looked like an interesting hobby. John Andrews, W1TAG |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re: Re: jason etc, hamilton mal |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Cdx and T/A tests, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Re: jason etc, hamilton mal |
Next by Thread: | LF: RE: Re: Re: Re: jason etc, WE0H |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |