Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: SV: Re: RX Frame Aerial for 136kc/s - still experimenting.....

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: SV: Re: RX Frame Aerial for 136kc/s - still experimenting.....
From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:39:37 +0100
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Thread-index: AcKKRaP3SeNgMoH2TA+pM15pnojY/AAAqu/Q
Thread-topic: Re: RX Frame Aerial for 136kc/s - still experimenting.....
The main loop is 26turns 1x1m - it is still square, Q=150, tuning capacitance 
550pF,
the coupling loop is 50x50cm

73
Jan-Martin
LA8AK

-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: g6tmk [mailto:[email protected]]
Sendt: 12. november 2002 13:04

Hello Jan-Martin,
How big is your frame antenna ?
73
Hugh M0WYE

----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:16 AM
Subject: LF: RX Frame Aerial for 136kc/s - still experimenting.....


Hi

still experimenting with frame antenna for 136kHz. The attached drawing
(20kB)
shows almost how it would have been made today, somewhat different from
the actual antenna.

Experienced that it was no need for amplifier for a loop for 80m reception
(used to avoid electrical noise from the open power lines),
and now also experienced that an amplifier did not improve reception for my
136kHz aerial,
the coupling has 1/100 area of the whole frame, seems to work for 50 ohm,
the tuning range seems to be somewhat too small, need somewhat increased
capacitance in cold weather, but it is low enough for rain.

The S/N ratio is almost the same with the coupling loop as for high
impedance
amplifier connected to the end of capacitance.

The aerial has been tested in +10°C....-2°C

Signal strength last night for DCF39 was 80-150µV (-75...-80dBU)

Not sure if it is still a point to ground the center of the tuned loop.

73

Jan_Martin
[email protected] (WW.Loc: JO38XC)
N4623-Kristiansand (tel.: +47-380-87178)
http://www.laud.no/la6nca/la8ak/






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>