Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Ampliphase

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Ampliphase
From: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:08:27 -0500
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Hi David, and all,

There have been a few 'wet' Amplis.
Big L, probably the most 'pro' of the sixties pirates, had a 'G'.   The most 
bizarre
was probably the 100kW version on RNI's 'Mebo II', which had two of the mondo
PA tubes per phase; the rectifier stacks apparently weren't up to much so 40kW was a good day. Of course, there was the 'H' on the Ross. And one on the Nannell, which never saw light. (Ahem. I wonder which one you knew? Anorak roulette. . .)

The worst part about them was the phase-modulator itself, which was a 24" rack
wide box full of dozens of tubes and tweaks, with inexorable, continual, alignment creep evidently being the feature most striven for in its design. Mercifully, someone came up with a solid-state replacement. On reflection, the same could be achieved very much more simply nowadays. But it wouldn't use 807s in the crystal oscillators(!); no fun.

The two carriers were held 135 degrees apart at 'no modulation';  obviously
they swung to in-phase for maximum amplitude and to out-of-phase for minimum; as to be expected the raw modulation linearity was, well, not very, but was corrected adequately by copious feedback, detected at the output. I suspect that a measure of pre-distortion was contrived in the differential phase-modulator stages, too.

Still, the basic premise of two class-'C's being more efficient than a 'C' plus an 'AB' was a good one.
Even bog-standard plate-modulated senders had a hard time, especially on 558,
where the high Q of the antenna system (which made modulating high audio frequencies tough enough anyway) persisted in being high Q but definitely 'somewhere else' in frequency as the boat leaned . . . very audible on air, assuming the thing hadn't ker-chonked in disgust.

       Cheers,

               Steve        W3EEE


1/30/2002 1:04:58 AM, [email protected] wrote:

[email protected] writes:

    interestingly, changing the phase to produce amplitude modulation was the

    approach RCA followed in the 1960's with their "ampliphase" AM
medium-wave and short-wave transmitters

I remember it well.
  Worked fine on land, and then someone put a 50kW ampliphase transmitter on
  a ship in the north sea. They saw some 'interesting' effects as the ship
  rolled and the distance from the mast to sea (together with the feed
impedance) changed.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>