Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: Farewell, LFers

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Farewell, LFers
From: "Larry Kayser" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 06:27:06 -0400
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>

Even in Larry's case, where
a private remote station with (I understand) both receiver and transmitter
at the
same location is used, and provided the location of this remote station is
used on
any confirmation, is probably OK.
"Even", "provided" and "probably OK"?????  I rarely differentiate between
remote TX or RX or in many cases both in use at one time for one reason or

Any claims for best
dx or personal satisfaction in working a particular station is thrown
completely out
of the window.  It is this deceipt aspect which I think has much upset Ron
G6RO, who
rightly thought his signals were being heard in Windsor and not Crawley.
"thrown completely out of the window" and "deceipt"???????????????????????

but wish to make it clear that there are quite a few of us with big
about this 'new technology' tool.
Dave, have all the reservations you want, I have no problem with that.  I do
have a problem when words like "probably OK" and "deceipt" are "thrown"
around.  From what I read here it seems that you have a problem with what is
going on, I urge you to keep your words as your explicit problem.  There is
not in general a problem.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>