Re: LF: CFH?not so Dumb Question

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: CFH?not so Dumb Question

from [Rik Strobbe]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: CFH?not so Dumb Question
From:	"Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date:	Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:10:55
In-reply-to:	<7D653C9C42F5D411A27C00508BF8803D55C5FA@PDW-MAIL-R1>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>


At 09:13 25/10/01 +0100, you wrote:

Why do the Canadian Navy need to transmit on 137kHz ?What does a broadcast on this frequency offer that either HF or satellite
comms cannot supply ?

Probably nothing, but I assume that the military likes to have alternative
ways of communication in case one way fails.
So most likely they just want to keep their frequency occupied (use it or
loose it).

73, Rik  ON7YD

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: CFH?not so Dumb Question, Talbot Andrew Re: LF: CFH?not so Dumb Question, Rik Strobbe <= LF: Re: CFH?not so Dumb Question, Larry Kayser

Previous by Date:	LF: Re: Loading coils and shorted turns, Claudio Girardi
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Re: Loading coils and shorted turns, Mike Dennison
Previous by Thread:	LF: CFH?not so Dumb Question, Talbot Andrew
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: CFH?not so Dumb Question, Larry Kayser
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]