To: | "LF Mailing List" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: The CFA Antenna (again...) |
From: | "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 01 Aug 2001 17:17:03 +0200 |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
It seems that the CFA Antenna now has a new incarnation, under the name 'EH Antenna'. Look here : http://www.netcommander.com/home/w5qjr-/index.htm Or, for ham-related stuff, here : http://www.qsl.net/w0kph/ What makes me perplex, is the citation of 'independent E and H fields'. Unless I completely misunderstood what Maxwell said, the only case when an E field can exist without a corresponding H field (and viceversa), is when they are stationary (in time) fields. Or am I wrong ? 73 Alberto I2PHD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: Re: SV: Re: SV: LF Receivers, Andrew Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: The CFA Antenna (again...), James Moritz |
Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: Re: SV: Re: SV: LF Receivers, Andrew Talbot |
Next by Thread: | LF: The CFA Antenna (again...), James Moritz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |