Re: LF: Re. DFCW an idea.

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Re. DFCW an idea.
From:	"Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:10:15
In-reply-to:	<001d01c0cee7$3937cf60$ba62883e@g3aqc>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

At 07:55 27/04/01 +0100, you wrote:

Thanks to all for your comments and encouragement. I suppose I should reallylike to be able to respond to Rik's ideas about synchronisation between

the TX

and RX,but I dont have the necessesary programing expertise to modify any ofthe existing programs.


The most recent version of QRS supports 'time synchronisation'. I am not a
specialist in DSP stuff, but my 'intuition' says that the knowledge of the
exact start/stop time of a dot can be used to improve SNR.

73, Rik  ON7YD

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re. DFCW an idea., Laurie Mayhead Re: LF: Re. DFCW an idea., Rik Strobbe <= LF: Re: DFCW an idea., Alberto di Bene LF: Re: Re: DFCW an idea., Fred Rattray

Previous by Date:	LF: Re. DFCW an idea., Laurie Mayhead
Next by Date:	LF: Re: Variable phase / BPSK modulators, James Moritz
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re. DFCW an idea., Laurie Mayhead
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: DFCW an idea., Alberto di Bene
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]