Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Re. VE1ZZ

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re. VE1ZZ
From: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 15:20:04
In-reply-to: <3A531C89.2032.BB2276@localhost>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Mike is 200% right, just look at the meaning of ERP :
Effective Radiated Power

regarding Mals question : Why do the 'commercials' on LF use giant antennas ?
1. Because they want a certain ERP (let's say 100kW) and in that range of
ERP it is cheaper to have a big antenna (at 50% efficiency) fed with 200kW
than a small antenna (at 1% efficiency) fed with 10MW.

2. Very high power into a small antenna will create additional problems (as
extreme voltage) that can be avoided with big antennas

But we hams live in a different world with our 1 Watt ERP restriction,
apart from legal limitations (building restrictions) a 30 or 40m tower will
be more expensive than a 2kW PA. So it often will be cheaper and easier to
get 1 Watt ERP with a smaller antenna and more power.

73, Rik  ON7YD

At 12:35 3/01/01 -0000, G3XDV wrote:
G3KEV wrote:
So you are saying that 1W
erp from a dummy load radiates just as efficiently as 1W from a  200
ft vertical for instance.

and DK8KW retorted:
... no, surely not!

But of course the statement is true. 1W ERP from a dummy load inside a Faraday screeen inside lead-lined container will also radiate as well as 1W ERP from a full sized dipole. The key word is Radiated (the R in ERP). You will need an awful lot of megawatts (gigawatts?) to get 1W ERP from such a dummy load but once that watt is radiated there is no difference.



Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT)
http://www.lf.thersgb.net





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>