LF: Re: Re: Re: CW allocations...

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: Re: Re: Re: CW allocations...
From:	"Graeme Zimmer" <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:10:05 +1100
References:	<006101c08906$639397c0$0301a8c0@steve> <011a01c08990$56bd0ce0$7a5b868b@gzimmer> <003101c089e1$b7cd35e0$5d8074d5@w8k3f0>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

> (and please keep in mind that "CW" means Carrier Wave, not "Morse"..)

I thought CW means Continuous Wave. Am I wrong?


Thanks Dick, you are right of course..

"Continuous Wave" as distinct from "Damped Wave" as in a Spark TX...

Silly of me....

............... Zim

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: CW allocations..., Steve Olney LF: Re: CW allocations..., Graeme Zimmer LF: Re: Re: CW allocations..., Dick Rollema LF: Re: Re: Re: CW allocations..., Graeme Zimmer <= LF: Re: Re: Re: CW allocations..., John Rabson

Previous by Date:	LF: Earth Rods / Spectrograms, James Moritz
Next by Date:	LF: Re: Earthing, John Rabson
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: Re: CW allocations..., Dick Rollema
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: Re: Re: CW allocations..., John Rabson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]