No, the version of Spectrogram I use does not have the time delay
function. Use Spectran instead. For this 2.5Hz mode Gram will not go
narrow enough I suspect. even if you do get the delay right.
Andy G4JNT
----------
From: Ko Versteeg[SMTP:[email protected]]
Reply To: [email protected]
Sent: 2000-06-25 10:35
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: SMT Hell
Andy..
Using SpectroGram here, any idea what the best value
for the time scale in msec is.
Running it at 3000Msec now but traces are very weak.
73 de Ko, NL9222
----------
> From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
> To: LF Group <[email protected]>
> Subject: LF: SMT Hell
> Date: Saturday, June 24, 2000 11:53 PM
>
> For information, I am transmitting a 2.5 Hz wide SMT Hell signal
> continuously on 137.6kHz with pixel duration 2s. Use Spectran at
0.031
Hz
> resolution and about 40 - 50% speed, averaging off. Power output
is 5
> Watts RF to the antenna, about -33dBW ERP.
>
> However, there may be a short break sometime tomorrow (Sunday) while
I
> re-route the coax feed to the antenna.
>
> Andy G4JNT
>
--
The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence
is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s).
For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution,
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is
prohibited and may be unlawful.
| 