Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Shrinking sounds - fiasco

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Shrinking sounds - fiasco
From: "Petr Maly" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 15:10:24 +0200
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Paul, you haven't read the previous messages, have you. We don't talk about
compressing sound files.

Petr, OK1FIG

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Keinanen <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Shrinking sounds - fiasco


On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 09:56:46 +0200, "Petr Maly" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Hello all
>Yesterday I spent a while with shrinking WAV's in SoundForge and
CoolEdit.
>In the original file (da0lf), there is nothing heard by ear, but when the
>file is open in the Gram, the signal trace is clearly visible. I tried to
>shrink to 50% of the previous length as a first step. I could not hear
>anything either. When I opened the new file in the Gram, the signal
>disappeared completely.

Just a check, but what method did you use to shrink these files ?

Any pesky lossy psychoacoustic compression method such as MP3, Musicam
etc. is definitely NOT suitable for compressing such files. The idea
with all the psychoacoustic compression is to remove all the data that
is not going to be _heard_ due to masking by a strong nearby signal or
by wideband noise (as in this case).

If you use some kind of compression, make sure that you are using some
_lossless_ compression method.

Paul OH3LWR






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>