Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: CFA Antenna

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: CFA Antenna
From: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 09:47:37 +0100
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Can anyone identify the issue(s) of Wireless World where it first
appeared.  It would be interesting to extract them from the archives and
read up on just what was published

Andy  G4JNT

----------
From:   Peter Dodd[SMTP:[email protected]]
Reply To:       [email protected]
Sent:   2000-06-21 07:51
To:     [email protected]
Subject:        LF: Re:  CFA Antenna: miraculous?


The CFA antenna is made by Hately Antenna Technology (GM3HAT). Every month for many years now the RSGB has carried an advertisment for this company. (until May, when the advertisment said they were moving QTH and don't try and contact them until further notice)

One outstanding characteristic of this antenna is the lack of information on it - after all these years.

The other characteristic is the lack of comparitive test (review) information on it - after all these years.

The Wireless World (now Electronics World + Wireless World) did several articles on the CFA but there was never enough information to duplicate it. Finally an article 'CFA - RIP' appeared in May 1993 (I have a copy), where a test version of the CFA radiation was -23dB relative to a reference dipole. However, the radiation level did not vary as the phase angle (using the phasing unit) was changed, therefore it was not performing as the theory said it should.

The <www.antennex.com> website promises information - at a price.
Has any one used a CFA (or knows of someone who has used one) on any
band?

--
Regards, Peter, G3LDO

<[email protected]>




--
The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence
is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s).
For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is
prohibited and may be unlawful.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>