Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Aerial tests. |
| From: | "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Jun 2000 15:13:43 +0200 |
| Organization: | Freeler |
| References: | <[email protected]> <000301bfcc87$d6d381a0$9dd699d4@w8k3f0> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
> This is not confirmed by computer simulation. > Shouldn't you say "Computer simulations do not model this". Decca did a lot of measurements when they developed Navigator, and the physics always has the last word. The question should therefore be "what is wrong with the computer model?" Stewart G3YSX The computer did not simulate the Decca mast but the small L-antenna used by Jim. 73, Dick, PA0SE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: RE: [Fwd: [Lowfer] New software available for copying weak QRS-CW], Gasparik Richard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: 137.600.....Hell its Andy, Alan Melia |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Aerial tests., Stewart Bryant |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Mutual couplingi of antennas at Puckeridge, M. Bruno |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |