To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Aerial tests. |
From: | "M.J.Powell" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 4 Jun 2000 13:43:08 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <003701bfce1a$2a24f580$93fb88d4@w8k3f0> |
References: | <[email protected]> <000301bfcc87$d6d381a0$9dd699d4@w8k3f0> <[email protected]> <003701bfce1a$2a24f580$93fb88d4@w8k3f0> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
In message <003701bfce1a$2a24f580$93fb88d4@w8k3f0>, Dick Rollema <[email protected]> writes To All from PA0SE In an earlier e-mail I wrote:>Computer program AO by Brian Beezley, K6STI, shows for the L-antennaover>medium ground an almost perfect omnidirectional radiation pattern. The >deviation >from a circle is no more than about 0.1dB.Mike Powell commented:And yet did not Marconi use a vertical antenna with a long horizontal wire to obtain directivity from Cape Race? When the original aerials came down in a gale he found equal or stronger signal strengths using an inverted 'L' with the arm pointing the right way.Mike, It depends on the length of the horizontal part af the antenna. Jim used only 42m. When the top is increased to 0.1 wavelength than a F/B-ratio of 2.23dB results. With a top of 0.25 wavelength F/B becomes 3.51dB. Thanks, Dick Considering the poor receivers in use at the time and the ratio of vertical to horizontal (1:1?) I would have expected a bigger improvement.Mike -- M.J.Powell |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Aerial tests, g3kev |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: GPS Frequency reference., Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Aerial tests., Dick Rollema |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Aerial tests., Walter Blanchard |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |