Re: LF: CFH... why wait for winter?

["Mike Dennison" <mike.dennison@rsgb.org.uk>]

DF6NM wrote:
> yesterday night, the qrn seemed to be fairly moderate, so I decided to
> start spectrogram at 22:00 UT (5513 Hz, 512 pts, 30 s dwell, 128 averages,
> resolution bandwidth with windowing appr. 14 Hz). In the morning, I was
> quite surprised to see a fat trace of CFH 137.0 kHz beginning at 
> 00:10. 
Yes, I have noticed that CFH has often been S9 after 0000UTC in 
the last two weeks. I suffer from insomnia from time to time, but 
one bonus is that I am able to check signals in the night.


Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT)
http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/activity.htm