I think the second posting was an attempt at sarcasm. Unsurprising that it
was lost on an international audience. It's a shame that posters here feel
they have to resort to that kind of language to make a point.
Peter G4MJS
----- Original Message -----
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: 17 April 2000 11:52
Subject: LF: changing opinions
I copied this from 2 recent messages sent to the reflector by the same OM.
Seems that some peoples opinions regarding commercial antennas can change
rapidly.
73, Rik ON7YD
date : 5 april 2000
subject : Re: LF: Decca Masts
>Good luck to those involved, it is an oppertunity in a life time to work
from a
>COMMERCIAL SITE, in spite of the recent critizism to the contrary about
>following the COMMERCIAL approach and using large towers!!!!!!!!!!!
date : 12 april 2000
subject : Re: LF: Re: TransAtlantic II, test notice - announcement
>How can anyone claim any credit/achievement using a commercial antenna
system
>and data systems that need chip rate detectors controlled by computers.
This is
>getting away from what is considered the norm in amateur radio.
| 