| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: more on spectrogram |
| From: | "wireless" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Jul 1999 13:19:53 +0100 |
| Organization: | T@ylor Training |
| References: | <000001bed6ee$d989cd80$63976dc2@v3q4v1> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Perhaps I can answer my own question. I have just tried v5.08 on a weak signal that I had recorded. In my opinion it outperforms not just 5.01 but also 4.26. 73 John Taylor G0AKN [email protected] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Who uses EZNEC, Soegiono, Gamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Who uses EZNEC, P. W. Schnoor |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Weekend report july 24-26th. 1999., M. Sanders |
| Next by Thread: | LF: report 25., Koenig, Wolfgang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |