Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Receiving

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Receiving
From: "Hans-Joachim Brandt" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 13:42:50 +0200
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Hello all,

concerning LF preselection I do accept Rik's experiences, and I have been wondering why he did not try this before using the simple attenuator. It is true that near by stations such as DBF39 and DCF39 will not be much attenuated by such an input filter (without special poles provided to suppress them). But the blocking of the receiver is not caused so much by these near-by signals but by the sum of all stations delivered by the aerial, especially the LF broadcast stations of course, and this sum can be reduced considerably by such an input filter.

One problem behind this is that suitable slug tuned coil forms as used in former LF/MF radio sets (I still have some which had been sold for bargain prices almost 20 years ago to clean the store) have almost completely disappeared from the market. These coils can be wound with litz wire to get rather high Q, and they can hardly be saturated due to the small mass of the iron powder core. Today the first attempt to design LF filter coils is to employ pot cores. Obviously pot cores with sufficient volume (especially for the first coil close to the aerial) but rather moderate AL value and sufficient air gap are necessary for the input filters we need for this purpose.

73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB

Rik wrote:
Resonant circuits have the advantage to attenuate out-of-the-band signals
selective. But to my experience it can have 2 'hooks' :
1. Attenuation of close to the band signals (eg. DBF39 / DCF39) is minimal
2. When using unsuitable ferrites these filtere can even create
intermodulation-signals themselves
I did some experiments with bandpass filters but at the end a simple
attenuator did the best job (with me) and has the advantage that the
attenuation can easily be adjusted to optimum ratio between the wanted
signal and IM-products.
I managed to built a 3-stage 136kHz filter with about 700Hz bandwidth
(-3dB), but when I connected it to the big antenna it produced a lot of noise.
But I am sure that with the proper ferite materials and filter component
dimensions a usefull filter can be constructed.
It would be great if those who already constructed good filter would let
the others benefit from their experience.

73, Rik


Rik Strobbe  ON7YD
[email protected]
Villadreef 14  B-3128 Baal  BELGIUM   (JO20IX)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>