Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+getting\s+on\s+8\.970kHz\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: VLF: getting on 8.970kHz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 10:40:49 +0200
Hi Jack, Ok, so i'm continuing to write on the reflector. It is not at all a waste of time to read the conversation. Most potential newcomers are in a similar situation like you and they may be inter
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00046.html (19,408 bytes)

2. Re: VLF: getting on 8.970kHz (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:21:21 +0000
Hi Jack, I agree with Stefan that a loop is not a very good choise to transmit on LF, for the simple reason that the radiation resistance (Rrad) of a loop drops with the 4th power of the frequency, w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00047.html (20,901 bytes)

3. Re: VLF: getting on 8.970kHz (score: 1)
Author: Ward K7PO <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:43:26 -0400
All, I am reading these posts with interest. Within the next 2 weeks, I will be able to transmit on ~8 khz from SW US (Arizona). My antenna is the one in use currently for WH2XXP on 630m and 2200m. I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00052.html (22,146 bytes)

4. Re: VLF: getting on 8.970kHz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 21:10:20 +0200
Hi Ward, Wow, that sounds fine. Do you know the antenna C or the coils L? I estimate it is 1.8 nF, so you need just ~ 200 mH for 8270 Hz. With 100W and an assumed loss of 250 Ohm you will get 630 mA
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00053.html (23,506 bytes)

5. Re: VLF: getting on 8.970kHz (score: 1)
Author: JACK ASKEW <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:01:23 -0600 (MDT)
Hi Stefan, Thank you for the technical support and reasons to go with a big coil instead of a big loop. The main reason I originally chose the loop was because of the size of the property we have her
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00055.html (22,775 bytes)

6. Re: VLF: getting on 8.970kHz (score: 1)
Author: JACK ASKEW <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 11:17:05 -0600 (MDT)
Hi Stefan It appears that Amazon will not ship that XCSourse GPS Locating Module NEO-6M to Canada. I questioned XCSource why this is so and I'm waiting back for an alternate or answer from them. Ther
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00060.html (21,023 bytes)

7. Re: VLF: getting on 8.970kHz (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 21:49:58 +0200 (CEST)
look for ublox neo-7m modules. they will go over 10MHz (neo-6m modules will generate <1kHz). they were avaliable on dx.com, ebay.com and other auction sites. these will work <10MHz (according to manu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00061.html (19,647 bytes)

8. Re: VLF: getting on 8.970kHz (score: 1)
Author: JACK ASKEW <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 14:31:18 -0600 (MDT)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00062.html (22,183 bytes)

9. Re: VLF: getting on 8.970kHz (score: 1)
Author: Ward K7PO <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:12:18 -0400
Stefan, I measured my antenna today at 8.275 khz. At resonance, I measure 228 ohms. You had predicted 250 ohms so I feel good with that number. Winding the matching toroid now and I will begin transm
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00124.html (24,792 bytes)

10. RE: VLF: getting on 8.970kHz (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 02:47:18 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00125.html (33,178 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu