Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+SpecLab\s+filter\s+optimisation\s+tests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+SpecLab\s+filter\s+optimisation\s+tests\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. VLF: SpecLab filter optimisation tests (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:39:10 +0100; Dear VLF, In my 9th experiment, my signal was well received at 4X1RF in 2873 km distance. Chris has recorded the whole procedure and sent me 4.5 GB on a DVD as a registered letter (many thanks Chris!; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00491.html (11,657 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: SpecLab filter optimisation tests (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:50:41 +0100; Hello Lubos, Is the difference of the minimum of the single turn VLF loop higher than on the multi turn loop? If so, then the single turn loop would be best for getting an optimal SNR. Interesting! M; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00548.html (14,303 bytes)
3. Re: VLF: SpecLab filter optimisation tests (score: 1): Author: Lubomir Bobalik <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 08:21:50 +0100; Hello Stefan! Many thanks for your effort to improve SL setting. It is as important as having good antenna. I wrote your new parameters to my SL setting to try this one. Gerhard, OE3GHB, was transmit; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00641.html (14,099 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]