Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+QRM\?\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+QRM\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. RE: VLF: QRM? (score: 1): Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 15:22:16 -0700; Thank You Stefan, I’ve opened a window centered on 11904.76190; this will be very helpful, much appreciated. Thank you also for the confirmation of QRM. 73, Jim AA5BW From: owner-rsgb_lf_group; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00446.html (12,305 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: QRM? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 22:50:32 +0100; Hi Jim, Am 27.12.2013 19:30, schrieb hvanesce: [...] but I do not know the offset of my sound card clock; my sound card clock and my low-accuracy reference clock differ by 0.3Hz (+/- 1mHz over short; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00864.html (9,998 bytes)
3. Re: VLF: QRM? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 23:42:25 +0100; Jim, Do you intend or can you imagine to set up a VLF grabber in Arizona? It could be a good motivating factor for experimental VLF stations in the US and we all can see how the situation looks on yo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00865.html (13,445 bytes)
4. VLF: QRM? (score: 1): Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 11:30:04 -0700; Is the signal in the attached most likely QRM? The amplitude has varied by only +/-5dB over a 24 hour period*, which makes me think that the signal is local (QRM). The two frequencies exhibited by th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00878.html (11,448 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]