Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+E\-field\s+receivers\s+in\s+Todmorden\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+E\-field\s+receivers\s+in\s+Todmorden\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. VLF: E-field receivers in Todmorden (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 09:04:18 -0400; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00005.html (11,223 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: E-field receivers in Todmorden (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 06:43:28 +0000; I wonder. One curious fact supporting this is the noise blanker drop factor. This is the proportion of time the blanker is active. The drop factor is always a bit higher on the new rx than the old wh; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00010.html (10,389 bytes)
3. Re: VLF: E-field receivers in Todmorden (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 16:14:24 +0000; The old rx is down at the moment, being measured on the work bench. The system noise floor is about 140nV/m in 1Hz. That's very high but quite low enough for natural radio (for which it is mainly use; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00071.html (11,808 bytes)
4. Re: VLF: E-field receivers in Todmorden (score: 1): Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:06:30 +0200 (CEST); Merging the currents from multiple front-end devices is a conventional way to achieve ultra low noise and this looks like a good implementation. I tried this technique with two devices but the doubl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00072.html (10,854 bytes)
5. Re: VLF: E-field receivers in Todmorden (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 06:50:24 -0400; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-09/msg00073.html (13,128 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]