Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+DF6NM\s+on\s+8970\.002\s+\-\s+samplerate\s+detector\s+seems\s+ok\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+DF6NM\s+on\s+8970\.002\s+\-\s+samplerate\s+detector\s+seems\s+ok\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: VLF: DF6NM on 8970.002 - samplerate detector seems ok (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:11:57 -0400 (EDT); In the meantime, I could reproduce the long transient in SpecLab's samplerate lock. It is apparently brought up by a thermal samplerate drift on my netbook after turnon. In the attached screenshot yo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00202.html (13,292 bytes)
2. VLF: DF6NM on 8970.002 - samplerate detector seems ok (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:47:00 -0400 (EDT); Just a short update: I tried a quick local test of the SR detector between two instances of the latest SpecLab 277 b22. The SR detector engaged, and the generator output followed within seconds. So i; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00740.html (12,588 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]