Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+Carrier\s+on\s+6470\.005\s+Hz\s+\-\s+and\s+6469\.9975\s+Hz\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:52:32 -0400
Looks like Stefan's carrier was back on 6470.005 today from 8:40 to 13:40 UT. I have stacked a few coils again, and since 13:30 I'm running a carrier on 6469.9975 Hz with 0.21 A. Trying to see whethe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00174.html (13,122 bytes)

2. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:13:42 +0000
Looks to be about 0.06 fT here, but not significant against the noise floor in one hour integration. If you can run for 3 hours it could show up well. For comparison, Stefan's (nighttime) 6470 signal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00177.html (12,287 bytes)

3. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:34:22 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00179.html (12,455 bytes)

4. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:47:09 +0000
Stefan today is averaging 0.25 fT and 25.8 dB S/N in 69.4 uHz. After 3 hours, 0.06 fT with S/N 12.3 dB in 92.6 uHz. Sure, no problem... From today's daytime signals DK7FC on 6470.0050, 09:00 to 13:00
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00183.html (12,857 bytes)

5. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 17:13:03 -0400
My carrier was on air from 13:30 until 20:35 UT. It is well visible on Stefan's east-west loop, apparently with more favourable daytime propagation compared to 8.27 kHz. Unfortunately no clear trace
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00190.html (13,758 bytes)

6. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 07:42:09 +0000
Averaged 0.06 fT, S/N 13.0 dB in 39.7 uHz, phase -88.6 degrees. Not bad for 1028 km at 6470 Hz, and I suppose about 5 or 10uW ERP? Here is 4 hours of Stefan's signal yesterday http://abelian.org/vlf/
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00192.html (12,078 bytes)

7. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 07:12:32 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00194.html (12,458 bytes)

8. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 11:39:43 +0000
Just goes to show that, although it's hard to radiated more than a few uW at VLF, a little power goes a long way at those frequencies. Perhaps it encourages others to have a go. Understood. I expect
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00195.html (12,179 bytes)

9. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 08:00:34 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00196.html (12,286 bytes)

10. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:51:43 +0200
Hi Markus, A big signal here, 16 dB SNR in 424 uHz. That gives an impression how well you could see me if there would be no local QRM on your side... 73, Stefan Am 14.04.2017 15:52, schrieb Markus Ve
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00201.html (12,012 bytes)

11. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 15:28:51 +0200
Hello Paul, Jim, VLF, Very nice, thanks for the spectrum peak plot! It looks like the daytime offers a better SNR on that 46 km band on our distance, at least when QRN is low, and it was quite low du
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00205.html (13,729 bytes)

12. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:17:04 +0200
... transmission was stopped again at 15:08 UTC :-( I need more testing before running further EbNaut transmissions... 73, Stefan Am 15.04.2017 15:28, schrieb DK7FC: Hello Paul, Jim, VLF, Very nice,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00210.html (13,628 bytes)

13. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:21:55 +0000
That's a shame, it would have been a good decode. Tried the decoder anyway, but not enough signal received. Perhaps if we had 2 hours it would have been enough. -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00214.html (11,653 bytes)

14. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:21:39 +0100
Hi Paul & All, Since Storm Doris trashed my antennas, I have just got around to re-installing my Mini-Whip, although not very high. I started SpecLab running this afternoon with a 1mHz 600 sec VLF us
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00219.html (12,367 bytes)

15. Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:33:52 +0100
Sorry, Did not include the screenshot. Attached. Gary. Since Storm Doris trashed my antennas, I have just got around to re-installing my Mini-Whip, although not very high. I started SpecLab running t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00220.html (12,977 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu