Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+8270\:\s+now\s+8269\.990Hz\s+Sucess\!\?\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+8270\:\s+now\s+8269\.990Hz\s+Sucess\!\?\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz Sucess!?! (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 15:06:10 +0200; Hello Uwe, Thanks for the VLF transmission and the fun. The decoder quickly released a decode at a constant phase (4x 180)! I would guess this is a true decode. The message makes sense :-) I repeated; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00035.html (12,381 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz Sucess!?! (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 10:43:31 -0400; Thanks Uwe for the repeated transmission, and congratulations to you and Stefan for the successful decode! Unfortunately no joy here yet: The decoder decided for "N=" at 0.3 dB Eb/N0, which does not; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00038.html (13,925 bytes)
3. Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz Sucess!?! (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 13:09:27 -0400; Using the message "NM" (as shown by Stefan) to undo the phase modulation on the received signal, I got a peak with amplitude corresponding to Eb/N0 = -1.3 dB. Looks like we were pretty close, only ab; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00040.html (12,085 bytes)
4. Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz Sucess!?! (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 21:18:13 +0200; Am 02.04.2016 17:34, schrieb [email protected]: Stefan, pse show the two chars. NM Ill announce the next transmission (if and when the mains will have recovered), guess three chars (with sense; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00042.html (11,936 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]