Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+3\s+carriers\s+near\s+5170\s+Hz\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+3\s+carriers\s+near\s+5170\s+Hz\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. VLF: 3 carriers near 5170 Hz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 15:49:27 +0200; Hi Paul, Since 13:20 UTC im running 120 mA on 3 individual frequencies: 5090.005 Hz | 5130.005 Hz | 5170.005 Hz The phase and current of each carrier is individually hold constant. It is a sponatneou; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00288.html (10,221 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: 3 carriers near 5170 Hz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 18:25:05 +0200; Carriers stopped at 16:20 UTC.... 73, Stefan Am 27.10.2017 15:49, schrieb DK7FC: Hi Paul, Since 13:20 UTC im running 120 mA on 3 individual frequencies: 5090.005 Hz | 5130.005 Hz | 5170.005 Hz The ph; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00289.html (10,613 bytes)
3. Re: VLF: 3 carriers near 5170 Hz (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 18:03:41 +0000; Received in 92.6uHz H-field (new) E-field 5090.005: 9.3 dB 10.38 dB 5130.005: N/A See below 5170.005: N/A 10.2 dB N/A where the signal is too weak to measure. Something wrong with 5130.005, here's th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00290.html (11,591 bytes)
4. Re: VLF: 3 carriers near 5170 Hz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 20:49:24 +0200; Hi Paul, oops, that is strange. Maybe the PA is a bit nonlinear (slightly clipping) and the measurement is mixed up. I will try to solve that. Well the difference between 5090 and 5170 seems not to b; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00291.html (11,384 bytes)
5. Re: VLF: 3 carriers near 5170 Hz (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:40:12 -0400; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00292.html (11,981 bytes)
6. Re: VLF: 3 carriers near 5170 Hz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 11:26:16 +0200; Hi Markus, Just genial! I didn't think about this option. Also it is a bit harder to understand why it should be 90 deg. Now, i just restarted the 3 carriers and played with that option: In the attac; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00294.html (14,543 bytes)
7. Re: VLF: 3 carriers near 5170 Hz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 17:56:13 +0200; Am 28.10.2017 11:26, schrieb DK7FC: So, since 9:20 UTC the carriers are back at 140 mA. The carriers will run until 16:20 UTC. The 5130.005 carrier however stopped suddenly at 10:10. I restarted it a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00296.html (9,795 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]