Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Wolf\s+Config\s+Settings\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Wolf\s+Config\s+Settings\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Wolf Config Settings (score: 1): Author: Bill de Carle <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:00:40 -0400; At 04:38 AM 9/11/2009, I wrote: [..] once you accumulate half a Hz of frequency offset adding in more samples actually hurts more than it helps because ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ (that should be; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00136.html (9,167 bytes)
2. LF: Wolf Config Settings (score: 1): Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:37:50 +0100; Hello LFers, What are most of you fellows setting your Nr of frames value at in the Wolf Config screen? How important is this setting as to its effect on decodes? Thanks in advance for any/all replie; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00246.html (8,748 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Wolf Config Settings (score: 1): Author: Bill de Carle <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:38:17 -0400; For work at 500 kHz, I'd be tempted to go no longer than 16 frames. I'm beginning to think that the fast fades and poorer phase stability hurt the build-up of copy. While you may get your first clear; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00358.html (12,663 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Wolf Config Settings (score: 1): Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:57:36 -0400; J.B., For work at 500 kHz, I'd be tempted to go no longer than 16 frames. I'm beginning to think that the fast fades and poorer phase stability hurt the build-up of copy. While you may get your first; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00586.html (10,187 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Wolf Config Settings (score: 1): Author: Bill de Carle <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:58:34 -0400; What are most of you fellows setting your Nr of frames value at in the Wolf Config screen? How important is this setting as to its effect on decodes? Thanks in advance for any/all replies. Mine is se; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00799.html (9,638 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]