Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Wasilla\s+Alaska\s+VLF\s+\-\s+offline\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline (score: 1)
Author: Laurence KL7UK <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 05:24:54 -0800
Stefan, Markus and all = thanks - Ill do a 60000 window and cut out the 2nd fft's and Im sure that will help. Never thought about the second window loading till it hits you in the face..the 100% CPU
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00033.html (14,321 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:40:59 -0400
Hi Laurence, if I had only one to choose from, I'd definitely opt for the slowest "60000" window at 47 uHz. Depending on antenna orientation, this would definitely give Scott a chance, or perhaps one
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00092.html (12,254 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:09:31 +0100
Hi Laurence, Am 24.03.2011 14:24, schrieb Laurence KL7UK: The link to Scott looks interesting but as he and I have found out the path, even over water and comparatively "short" can be very very crank
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00164.html (14,759 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:45:44 +0100
Hi Laurence, Yes, try that test with Scott. 2000 km is nothing, HI. I assume you have less QRN than in EU and the path is mostly above water. We have seen here what can be achieved with some 100 uW E
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00252.html (12,665 bytes)

5. RE: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline (score: 1)
Author: Laurence KL7UK <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 06:34:02 -0800
VLF pre Eu dawn signals are way down from mid winter Stefan, but that signature increase on DHO38 signal between 0500 and 0700Z is still there. Looks to me like a mid winter opportunity only on this
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00321.html (11,442 bytes)

6. LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline (score: 1)
Author: Laurence KL7UK <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:56:03 -0800
I think Im giving my PC Tower in Alaska a bit too much work to do and have lost comms with the unit running multiples VLF Speclab instances. 136/136kHz/Knights QRSS 10Mhz snappers remain operational
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00435.html (9,548 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 02:24:25 +0100
Hello Laurence, No hope for the end of the season? Maybe you are right, unfortunately. But you'll come back in the next season, isn't it? :-) Or maybe just reducing to wideband and 6000 or so? A pity
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00569.html (10,822 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:01:11 +0100
Hi Laurence, Markus, VLF, Hmmmm, about the 60000 windows, Paul Nicholson means.... (see a part of our emails below) Am 19.03.2011 09:41, schrieb Paul: Hi Stefan, There is a limit set by the variabili
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00818.html (14,859 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu