Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPR\s+SNR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPR\s+SNR\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: WSPR SNR (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:24:29 +0100; Dear LF Group, The attached bit of spectrogram was set up for QRSS3 reception and shows 2 succesfully decoded WSPR transmissions from G4WGT at -30 and -27dB SNR respectively. I think this shows that; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01085.html (9,318 bytes)
2. Re: LF: WSPR SNR (score: 1): Author: Michel F5WK <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:09:48 +0100; Hello Jim, LF, I made a quick comparison a few days ago between a weak wspr signal and QRSS-3. With Spectrum Lab, I added noise to the locally generated beacon until no decoding. SNR below -28 db was; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01241.html (8,666 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]