To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: WSPR SNR |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:23:42 -0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=H+8DNUrq2S9AxJA3tbQ5CT+PhHoAlP8hS9DHQ8NHlzKMcdZIYEq+6FS2TGFdco3YFkMOJHPqPR7QDGlbEaTZc3e0emknqRbjo5F86EfPEweg8UPEU3ylDqvtQAd88z72mbMwpDEVns6P/Z4gkAMneexMQRUmva6ppfOWrndPbmk= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear LF Group,The attached bit of spectrogram was set up for QRSS3 reception and shows 2 succesfully decoded WSPR transmissions from G4WGT at -30 and -27dB SNR respectively. I think this shows that this mode should compete well with QRSS3 for readibility. So far, I have: 1654 1 0.6 0.503500 0 G4JNT IO90 30 1752 -28 1.0 0.503599 0 G4WGT IO83 37 1758 -30 1.0 0.503599 0 G4WGT IO83 37 1810 -30 1.1 0.503599 0 G4WGT IO83 37 1814 -27 0.9 0.503599 0 G4WGT IO83 37 Cheers, Jim Moritz73 de M0BMU
G4WGT_wspr.jpg |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: G4WGT WSPR 503.6 CARRIER / 502.1 DIAL, Graham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: WSPR SNR, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | LF: wspr-test saturday--137khz, "Eberhard v.Wedelstädt" |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: WSPR SNR, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |