Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPR\s+Dx\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPR\s+Dx\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. LF: WSPR DX (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:10:35 +0100; MF Beaming to ZL es VK this evening on 160 es 630 metres and any other DX around G3KEV/IO94SH Sent from Mail for Windows 10; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00228.html (8,543 bytes)
2. LF: WSPR Dx (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:09:15 +0100; Jim - You're decoding some wonderful DX on WSPR, including an M6 station at 19Mm. Impulsive interference or carriers? Andy www.g4jnt.com; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00461.html (9,186 bytes)
3. Re: LF: WSPR DX (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:21:20 +0100; OM ED I will settle for WG2XCT not as good as VK1 but better than the single hop over the garden fence as reported 24/7 by most from EU and the UK I would expect some DX with my antenna, maybe someth; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00101.html (13,309 bytes)
4. Re: LF: WSPR DX (score: 1): Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:57:31 +0000; On 18/02/2013 11:31, mal hamilton wrote: Yes I did decode you at the same time. I have noticed many times although I get decodes they do not always appear on the web DB, others have noticed the same,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00125.html (14,082 bytes)
5. Re: LF: WSPR DX (score: 1): Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:21:40 +0000; Here we go again twisting the facts, I have expressed no such concerns, you have. What world do you live in. CX4DVF has not been heard on WSPR on any band in the last 2 Weeks. Unless CX4DVF does not; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00147.html (12,514 bytes)
6. Re: LF: WSPR DX (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:34:22 +0100; Eddie if you are so concerned about the validity of CX4DVF/Sandos contact him and see if he was on air at the time specified g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] g3zjo To: rsgb_lf_; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00162.html (10,942 bytes)
7. Re: LF: WSPR DX (score: 1): Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:05:04 +0000; Hi Mal On 18/02/2013 09:26, mal hamilton wrote: MF Some good DX about this past couple of days this morning 0916 -25 1.4 0.475745 2 CX4DVF 13 Well at least the system wasn't stupid enough to think it; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00600.html (10,228 bytes)
8. Re: LF: WSPR DX (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:25:59 -0500; CX4DVF does not show up in the QRZ.com database. While not a 100% guarantee that the call doesn't exist it's a good start in checking for 'bogies'. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00602.html (9,612 bytes)
9. Re: LF: WSPR DX (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:33:00 +0100; Yes I did decode you at the same time. I have noticed many times although I get decodes they do not always appear on the web DB, others have noticed the same, something to do with the Internet speed; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00654.html (11,937 bytes)
10. LF: WSPR DX (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:29:00 +0100; MF Some good DX about this past couple of days this morning 0916 -25 1.4 0.475745 2 CX4DVF 13 This must indeed be a MIRACLE mode de G3KEV; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00748.html (8,911 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]