Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPR\-15\s+vs\s+WOLF\s+Tests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPR\-15\s+vs\s+WOLF\s+Tests\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: WSPR-15 vs WOLF Tests (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:29:01 -0500; John and I did a fairly controlled weak-signal test on 136 kHz yesterday, comparing WSPR-15 and Stewart Nelson's WOLF program (as modified by DL4YHF). For those that might be interested, John's write; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00208.html (8,604 bytes)
2. Re: LF: WSPR-15 vs WOLF Tests (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:29:13 +0100; Hi Jay, John, LF, Thanks once again for an accurate comparison of weak signal modes used on LF/MF. I don't know if you've informed Joe/K1JT about the test results (and if he's still subscribed to the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00226.html (9,984 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]