Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSJT\-X\s+v0\.5\s+r2788\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSJT\-X\s+v0\.5\s+r2788\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2788 (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:08:57 +0100; Thanks Joe, Well, the QRN on LF is quite different to that on HF. So probably the optimised parameter settings (to be found) will be quite different as well. As a spontan idea, maybe the program shou; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00314.html (12,228 bytes)
2. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2788 (score: 1): Author: Joe Taylor <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:35:46 -0500; Hi Stefan A general question to the NB: What do you think about its performance in the current state? Normally NB is disabled when starting the program. Applying a NB to "remove" QRN makes a big effe; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00341.html (10,540 bytes)
3. LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2788 (score: 1): Author: Joe Taylor <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:48:04 -0500; Revision 2788 of the experimental program WSJT-X has been posted. As usual, a link to it appears on the WSJT web site: http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjt.html The following is a direct lin; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00614.html (8,916 bytes)
4. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2788 (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:00:29 +0100; Hi Joe/K1JT, A general question to the NB: What do you think about its performance in the current state? Normally NB is disabled when starting the program. Applying a NB to "remove" QRN makes a big e; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00623.html (10,158 bytes)
5. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2788 (score: 1): Author: Joe Taylor <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:23:48 -0500; Hi Stefan, Well, the QRN on LF is quite different to that on HF. So probably the optimised parameter settings (to be found) will be quite different as well. Yes. That's why I have encouraged you and; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00917.html (10,781 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]