Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WD2XES\s+Slow\s+Howl\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. LF: WD2XES Slow Howl (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 22:50:39 +0100
WD2XES is running the 2.5 bit/second version of WOLF on 137.422 kHz with 50 watts if anyone wants to give it a try. Decodes OK here, but that's no miracle. The usual line timings are multiplied by fo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-11/msg00028.html (9,841 bytes)

2. Re: LF: WD2XES Slow Howl (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 01:31:12 +0100
Hi Jay the only thought I have is to use a tuned loop and compare the two quadrature positions these should be at least 30dB different in strength but that may not be enough for John when the Moon is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-11/msg00102.html (11,796 bytes)

3. Re: LF: WD2XES Slow Howl (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:19:26 +0100
Jay, Unfortunately there's no way to make XES weak at my location...unless he turns the wick way down :~) Maybe we can try that over the weekend, John. < A chain saw would reduce my ERP, too! I will
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-11/msg00104.html (10,402 bytes)

4. Re: LF: WD2XES Slow Howl (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 17:30:50 -0500
Wolf That's good to hear. As Alan pointed out earlier...running WOLF on a tiny antenna and therefore against a quiet noise floor is different than connected to a real antenna. Unfortunately there's n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-11/msg00106.html (11,491 bytes)

5. Re: LF: WD2XES Slow Howl (score: 1)
Author: Wolf DL4YHF <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:22:46 +0000
Hi John, Jay & others, I checked the performance of the slow WOLF variants, by adding an increasing amount of synthetic noise to the received signal until copy disappeared. Then switched TX+RX to the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-11/msg00107.html (10,204 bytes)

6. Re: LF: WD2XES Slow Howl (score: 1)
Author: Bill de Carle <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:06:44 -0500
Seems to be working - your sig is audible - just heard your CW ident at regular speed Good condx tonite Bill VE2IQ At 04:49 PM 11/13/2005, John wrote: WD2XES is running the 2.5 bit/second version of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-11/msg00118.html (10,081 bytes)

7. Re: LF: WD2XES Slow Howl (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Tilley" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:39:25 -0800
Why not... Papa Wolf Mama Wolf & Baby Wolf ? Really I'm kidding... Scott Hi John, Agreed - guess Stewart would agree to this too - so I already modified the main menu. Sounds better than "Half speed
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-11/msg00119.html (10,252 bytes)

8. Re: LF: WD2XES Slow Howl (score: 1)
Author: Wolf DL4YHF <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 22:21:43 +0000
Hi John, I suggest the following shorthand for these various speeds: WOLF10 for the "classic" speed. WOLF 2.5 and WOLF5 for the slow speeds. WOLF20 and WOLF40 for the fast speeds Agreed - guess Stewa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-11/msg00121.html (9,957 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu