Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Variometer\s+es\s+Loading\s+coils\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Variometer\s+es\s+Loading\s+coils\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Variometer es Loading coils (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:03:10 +0100; Stefan Your proposed solution is a Compromise so there will be losses or problems, If a switch is necessary use a large motor driven ceramic switch. I have seen some very large ceramic switches about; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00035.html (11,846 bytes)
2. LF: Variometer es Loading coils (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:11:11 +0100; If I needed two loading coils for one antenna to cover LF es MF I think I would use one Loading coil and short out turns not required for MF and one Variometer would do both. I do not have a loading; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00307.html (8,894 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Variometer es Loading coils (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:29:57 +0100; Am 13.01.2013 17:09, schrieb mal hamilton: If I needed two loading coils for one antenna to cover LF es MF I think I would use one Loading coil and short out turns not required for MF and one Variome; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00352.html (10,626 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Variometer es Loading coils (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:38:55 +0100; Sri, typos: Am 13.01.2013 17:29, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: But then the switch has to withstand the HV when TXing on MF. ...on LF. and a high inductance of the transformer then the 50 Ohm side is.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00381.html (9,491 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]