Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+To\s+Ponder\s+over\s+the\s+weekend\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:06:42 +0100
To All from PA0SE: Jim, M0BMU wrote: The un-neat thing about an oil dielectric is its propensity for catching fire... also, I don't think it has particularly low loss at RF - although a lot of big TX
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00249.html (11,269 bytes)

2. Re: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 23:58:10 +1300
Hi Jim While I have similar reservations there have been a few oil filled tuning caps used successfully here with tesla coils-not the best parallel to use but certainly close enough to make the prosp
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00253.html (12,952 bytes)

3. Re: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 14:06:12 +0000
Dear Dave, LF Group, At 08:43 09/11/2002 +1300, you wrote: The neat thing with the oil dielectric is it is basically self healing , even if it does arc over- no permanent capacitor damage will result
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00271.html (11,235 bytes)

4. Re: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 08:43:06 +1300
Both these problems are standard fare in 'older' physics texts- anyone rember Resnick & Halliday, for example? There is another more interesting side to Andy's problem as stated however. Consider the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00305.html (12,973 bytes)

5. RE: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:27:42 -0500
Jim, I think there is a Lowfer-like solutin to this problem. Seems to me that if everything is assumed to be 'ideal' or 'loss-free' including the wires, there would still have to be a TX loop antenna
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00308.html (11,002 bytes)

6. RE: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 16:27:28 +0000
Dear Andy, LF Group, At 14:57 08/11/2002 +0000, you wrote: Can tell you come from a university background Jim, do you ask that of applicants for courses at herts.ac? I was asked exactly the same ques
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00311.html (10,183 bytes)

7. Re: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 16:26:00 +0100
Hi Andy, Jim and all, This is a great question, because it tells a lot about the background of the person answering, even if the answer is "correct". The engineer will say that most of the "missing"
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00313.html (11,816 bytes)

8. RE: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 16:01:01 +0100
Can tell you come from a university background Jim, do you ask that of applicants for courses at herts.ac? I was asked exactly the same question when applying for Southampton Uni. in 1976. Andy G4JNT
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00314.html (10,810 bytes)

9. Re: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 18:47:37 +0000 (GMT)
When C decreases from 10 uF to 1 uF voltage increases from 10 V to 100 V So energy E=C*U^2/2 changes from 1e-5*10*10/2=0.5e-3 J to 1e-6*100*100/2= 0.5e-2 J. Where did extra energy come from? To drain
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00317.html (11,309 bytes)

10. Re: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 18:32:24 +0000 (GMT)
Here is another conundrum along similar lines - you have two identical, loss-free 1uF capacitors, one is charged to 10V, the other is discharged. You then connect the two in parallel so the total C i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00318.html (11,627 bytes)

11. SV: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:35:37 +0100
ha ha Yes, you said 25µJ per capacitor..... 73 Jan-Martin, LA8AK --Opprinnelig melding-- Fra: James Moritz [mailto:[email protected]] Sendt: 8. november 2002 12:52 Til: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00319.html (11,286 bytes)

12. Re: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 11:51:38 +0000
Dear Andy, LF group, Here is another conundrum along similar lines - you have two identical, loss-free 1uF capacitors, one is charged to 10V, the other is discharged. You then connect the two in para
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00322.html (11,423 bytes)

13. Re: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 18:22:45 +0000 (GMT)
Hi, Andrew and Group. An oil filled capacitor consists of two plates separated by a dielectric made of oil with a dielectric constant of 10. The capacitance is 10uF and it is charged to 10V. The oil
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00324.html (11,380 bytes)

14. LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 10:41:42 +0100
This simple puzzle caused more discussion in my office this morning than it had any right to. Have a ponder while waiting for next QRSS symbol to come through. Andy G4JNT -- From Circuit Cellar magaz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00331.html (10,083 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu