LF group. Sorry about the tone of this posting. It will probably be my last message to the LF reflector. I have better, more enjoyable things to do with my time. Mal, If you mean "RST 549 WX SUN QRU
I meant "rejectivity" and "narrow notch filter" of course... The selectivity, and hence the QRM rejecting performance, of most e-mail receivers can be greatly improved simply by inserting a narrow fi
Hi Jay / David, I'm willing to entertain the idea of setting a 500kHz grab up here in W3, but I'll need clues as to where to park it, and at what rate to run it. Not sure if the application would be
Mal, By all means tell us about the good things you have done. Please do not deride the achievements of others simply because you are not interested or cannot see the point. John F5VLF ** REPLY SEPAR
Thanks Laurie and others for the kind words re: grabber. The grabber RX (AR7030) is fed from my main 500kHz TX antenna and I discovered over the weekend that it was very off tune after more Shetland
Laurie - Ill be in KL7 15-20th March and looking forward to trying 500/137 to Eu - Let me know if you can run some DFCW as Im sure Im going to be blessed with some horizontal lines. Laurence 9V1LF en
John, We have had to endure e-mails from the source you mention since the early days of 136. The best way to treat them is to ignore them completely - treat them the same as you would a repeater jamm
I shall express an opinion when I consider it appropriate. Take it or leave it. Points of view are published in RADCOM some controversial and some otherwise. I am a member but do not get aggrivated b
Thanks Laurie and others for the kind words re: grabber. The grabber RX (AR7030) is fed from my main 500kHz TX antenna and I discovered over the weekend that it was very off tune after more Shetland