Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+T2\-ringing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+T2\-ringing\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: T2-ringing (score: 1): Author: "dj9dw" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:01:50 +0100; the choke is the only device, that I did not change. All the other methods were tried and invain. However, I did not dare connecting D to S for the reasons, you mentioned. I even thought of the PSU,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-01/msg00104.html (10,208 bytes)
2. Re: LF: T2-ringing (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:14:57 -0500; nonconducting side. Eather a steady current and heat on the FET's or by adding a cap from D to G. This may be a mistake, but please remember you may have peaks to 200V on the drains and a limit of 20; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-01/msg00122.html (8,699 bytes)
3. Re: LF: T2-ringing (score: 1): Author: "John Rabson" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:54:16 +0100; [...] I even thought of the PSU, which is stabilized by 5 times 3055. Is that cazy? No. If you get inexplicable behaviour in a piece of electronics and none of the obvious things cure it, check the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-01/msg00283.html (8,531 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]